By: Richard L. Smith
New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin has joined a coalition of 15 other state attorneys general in filing a federal lawsuit to block the National Science Foundation (NSF) from implementing sweeping changes that would cut funding to diversity-focused STEM programs and limit support for critical research nationwide.
According to a statement released by the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office, the lawsuit aims to stop directives issued by the NSF under the Trump Administration that would terminate projects supporting women, minorities, and people with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
The coalition also seeks to overturn a newly imposed cap on indirect research costs, such as lab space and equipment, set at 15 percent, which states say would severely undercut scientific advancement and innovation.
Platkin warned the changes would deliver a significant blow to New Jersey’s research institutions and high-tech sectors.
“These unlawful cuts will hurt the groundbreaking development happening in New Jersey every day and weaken our competitiveness in the global STEM landscape,” he said.
The NSF, a federal agency founded in 1950, has played a central role in supporting scientific research at U.S. universities. Part of its mission, mandated by Congress, is to promote diversity in STEM fields.
The lawsuit points out that past NSF programs have successfully expanded representation, with women and people of color significantly increasing their presence in STEM careers over the last few decades.
The new NSF policy directives, issued in April and May 2025, have already led to the cancellation of multiple diversity-related projects, according to the lawsuit.
Plaintiffs also argue that the cap on research infrastructure costs could result in widespread project shutdowns, staff layoffs, and long-term damage to public health, national security, and the economy.
The attorneys general argue that the NSF’s actions violate both the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution by unlawfully bypassing Congressional intent and altering federal policy without proper process.
The lawsuit seeks a court ruling to block the implementation of the changes.